Tag Archives: deliberation

AR; Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory?

In its current form, it might (not) be. Interested? Diana C. Mutz’s 2008 article might just prove to be one of the most important articles I’ve come across (thanks to my supervisor). It builds a very compelling case against the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

One quick note – two articles

I’ve been getting busier and busier – mostly with teaching -, as a result of which I’ve had to somewhat neglect blogging. This post won’t make up for it for sure- it’s not even a proper review by my own … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AR; Leader Democracy

In what is a bit of a paradox, the study of politics often neglects the study of politicians – points out a great article by András Körösényi. The piece presents a descriptive-explanatory model of democracy, highlighting the role of those … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

AR; Three models of democratic communication

Measuring the deliberative qualities of online instances of discussion is good – but the framework of measurement could be expanded, so that “instead of discarding non-deliberative posts as conceptual detritus, the framework would allow them to be contextualized alongside deliberative … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lippmann’s elitism

Alison Kadlec and Will Friedman’s article is a response to a set of critical arguments against deliberation, distilled from works of Iris Young and Lynn Sanders. Young, Sanders (and other, activist-minded critics) claim that formally and procedurally correct deliberation will … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AR; Why we need the devil’s advocate

“An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition.” “No, it isn’t.” Earlier I posted a review of Luigi Bobbio’s article Types of deliberation, and enthused about the so-called oratory model of deliberation. In this model, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AR; Do Dugg Diggers Digg Diligently?

Credit to Alexander Halavais for the title – as well as the subject of this post – his eponymous paper. The article examines the role of feedback in motivating commenters on Digg. (In a nutshell: feedback, either positive or negative, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

AR; how to cope with the scope?

Deliberation is a good thing, but it’s also very demanding. How can it serve as the organizing principle for a modern democracy, where a common position must be found not among a small group, but among millions of people? Will … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AR; coding deliberation, again

In the review of relevant literature, I’ve again come across two articles that try to tackle the thorny issue of measuring the qualities of deliberation. Of course the thorniness (thank you, thank you) of the issue lies in the fact … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AR; Is information good for deliberation?

Polletta, Chen and Anderson study in a recently published article the extent and effects of information sharing (link posting) in online deliberation. When asking the question “is it good for deliberation,” the authors look at the process, not the outcome … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment